Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Nissan Serena 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.2 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Nissan Serena is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 60 HP less power than Nissan Serena, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Nissan Serena. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger, but lower. Ford Galaxy is 12 cm longer than the Nissan Serena, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`160 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Nissan Serena has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan Serena, so Nissan Serena quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Nissan Serena has
| |