Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 268 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, but Ford Galaxy torque is 3 NM more than Seat Alhambra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.5 | |
| Ford Galaxy consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 1 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Galaxy is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.8 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford Galaxy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Ford Galaxy quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
| |