Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Toyota Previa 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 156 HP | |
Torque: | 268 NM | 225 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 48 HP more power than Toyota Previa, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Toyota Previa. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 10.8 | |
The Toyota Previa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
760 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Toyota Previa gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
Ford Galaxy is 14 cm shorter than the Toyota Previa, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Previa, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`240 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Toyota Previa has
| |