Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 240 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |