Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Mazda 5 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda 5 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 5, but torque is 18 NM more than Mazda 5. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 112 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1566 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Ford Galaxy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mazda 5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 5, so Mazda 5 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 5 has
| |