Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy 2006 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy 2003 engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Galaxy 2006, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Galaxy 2006. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 8.2 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy 2003 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy 2003 could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Galaxy 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy 2003 is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Galaxy 2003 is 18 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy 2006, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy 2003 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 308 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |