Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Seat Alhambra 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.4 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 1 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Galaxy is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.8 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |