Ford Galaxy 2005 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy 2006 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy 2005 engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Galaxy 2006, but torque is 10 NM less than Ford Galaxy 2006. Despite the higher power, Ford Galaxy 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy 2005 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy 2005 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy 2005 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy 2006. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy 2005 is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Galaxy 2005 is 18 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy 2006, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy 2005 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 308 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |