Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000

 
Ford Galaxy
2003 - 2006
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP90 HP
Torque: 310 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds10.9 seconds
Ford Galaxy engine produces 40 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Despite the higher power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.26.3
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km7.1 l/100km
By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle1110 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1340 km on highway
970 km with real consumption980 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.63 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.73 m1.73 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 1 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

low
Volkswagen Sharan has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Volkswagen Sharan quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 20002600
Pros and Cons: Ford Galaxy has
  • more power
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv