Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 15 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
970 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 1 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Galaxy is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.8 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Ford Galaxy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Ford Galaxy quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
| |