Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Seat Alhambra 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 15 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 1 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Galaxy is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 330 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2600 litres | 2610 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Ford Galaxy has more luggage space (by 74 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Alhambra (by 10 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.8 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`430 kg | 2`510 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`670 kg | 1`649 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 760 kg | 861 kg | |
| Ford Galaxy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Seat Alhambra. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |