Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Honda Stream 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Ford Galaxy) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda Stream) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Stream is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 26 HP less power than Honda Stream, but torque is 118 NM more than Honda Stream. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Stream, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Stream. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 7 cm longer than the Honda Stream, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 158 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 330 litres | 158 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2600 litres | 1520 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Ford Galaxy has more luggage space (by 172 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 1080 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda Stream. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`430 kg | 2`030 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`670 kg | 1`475 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 760 kg | 555 kg | |
| Ford Galaxy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem more than Honda Stream. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Honda Stream has
| |