Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Citroen C8 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy and Citroen C8 have the same engine power, but Ford Galaxy torque is 5 NM less than Citroen C8. Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller. Ford Galaxy is 9 cm shorter than the Citroen C8, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 225 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 225 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2948 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C8. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
| |