Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy 2006 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy 2003 engine produces 25 HP less power than Ford Galaxy 2006, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford Galaxy 2006. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Galaxy 2003 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy 2006, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy 2003 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy 2006. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy 2003 is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Galaxy 2003 is 18 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy 2006, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy 2003 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 308 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |