Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Toyota Previa 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota Previa, but torque is 60 NM more than Toyota Previa. Despite less power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
Ford Galaxy is 14 cm shorter than the Toyota Previa, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Previa, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`200 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
| |