Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Toyota Previa 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Previa is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota Previa, but torque is 60 NM more than Toyota Previa. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Previa gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Ford Galaxy is 14 cm shorter than the Toyota Previa, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Previa, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Toyota Previa has
| |