Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 1 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Galaxy is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.8 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford Galaxy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Ford Galaxy quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
| |