Ford Galaxy 2007 vs Ford C-Max 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 161 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | n/a NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 46 HP more power than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
660 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.63 m | |
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 44 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 432 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1684 litres | |
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Galaxy has 42 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. This could mean that the Ford Galaxy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford Galaxy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`050 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | high | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3600 | 5200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |