Ford Galaxy 2007 vs Ford C-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ford Galaxy 2007 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Galaxy 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 44 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1684 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Galaxy has 42 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. This could mean that the Ford Galaxy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford Galaxy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |