Ford Galaxy 2006 vs Mercedes Vito 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 109 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Ford Galaxy engine produces 31 HP more power than Mercedes Vito, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mercedes Vito. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Galaxy) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Mondeo, Ford Focus, Ford S-Max, Ford C-Max | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Galaxy might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | no data | |
Width: | 1.85 m | no data | |
Height: | 1.72 m | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 308 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4200 | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
| |