Ford Galaxy 2006 vs Seat Alhambra 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, but Ford Galaxy torque is 10 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ford Galaxy 2006 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Galaxy 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Galaxy is 19 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 308 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 308 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2325 litres | 2610 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Ford Galaxy has more luggage space (by 52 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Alhambra (by 285 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`505 kg | 2`510 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`735 kg | 1`665 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 770 kg | 845 kg | |
| Ford Galaxy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Seat Alhambra. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Ford Galaxy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Ford Galaxy quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |