Ford Galaxy 2006 vs Opel Vivaro 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 135 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Ford Galaxy engine produces 5 HP more power than Opel Vivaro, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 8.6 | |
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Vivaro, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
Ford Galaxy 2006 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Galaxy 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.96 m | |
Ford Galaxy is 4 cm longer than the Opel Vivaro, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 24 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 308 litres | 1200 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3100 litres | |
Opel Vivaro has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Galaxy has 892 litres less trunk space than the Opel Vivaro. This could mean that the Ford Galaxy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 2`900 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Opel Vivaro has
| |