Ford Galaxy 2006 vs Nissan Primastar 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 25 HP more power than Nissan Primastar, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Nissan Primastar. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.5 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Primastar, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Primastar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.94 m | |
| Ford Galaxy is 4 cm longer than the Nissan Primastar, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 308 litres | 2150 litres | |
|
Nissan Primastar has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Galaxy has 1842 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Primastar. This could mean that the Ford Galaxy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 2`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Nissan Primastar has
| |