Ford Galaxy 2006 vs Ford C-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy and Ford C-Max have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 44 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 308 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 308 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2325 litres | 1684 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 641 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`505 kg | 2`050 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`735 kg | 1`488 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 770 kg | 562 kg | |
| Ford Galaxy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem more than Ford C-Max. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |