Ford Galaxy 2006 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000

Ford Galaxy
2006 - 2010
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol


Power: 145 HP115 HP
Torque: 190 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 seconds15.2 seconds
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Galaxy engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.29.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.9 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
780 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank.


Length: 4.82 m4.63 m
Width: 1.85 m1.81 m
Height: 1.72 m1.73 m
Ford Galaxy is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford Galaxy is 19 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 308 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`800
Safety: no data

Volkswagen Sharan has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Sharan quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 42002600
Pros and Cons: Ford Galaxy has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: