Ford Galaxy 2006 vs Dodge Caravan 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy engine produces 35 HP less power than Dodge Caravan, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Dodge Caravan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 11.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Caravan, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Caravan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Ford Galaxy is 2 cm longer than the Dodge Caravan, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 308 litres | 566 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 566 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 308 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4160 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 2`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Dodge Caravan has
| |