Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 85 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but higher. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 390 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2325 litres | 2297 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Ford Galaxy has more luggage space (by 123 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 28 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`505 kg | 2`520 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`765 kg | 1`823 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 740 kg | 697 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |