Ford Galaxy 2011 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 60 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but higher. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 267 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Galaxy has 123 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. The Seat Alhambra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`370 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
| |