Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010

 
Ford Galaxy
2010 - 2015
Volkswagen Sharan
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP170 HP
Torque: 340 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds9.8 seconds
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Galaxy engine produces 7 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.05.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.0 l/100km7.6 l/100km
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1160 km in combined cycle1180 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1290 km on highway
870 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.85 m
Width: 1.88 m1.90 m
Height: 1.76 m1.74 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 3 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 390 litres885 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 390 litres300 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data885 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2325 litres2430 litres
In 7-seat version Ford Galaxy has more luggage space (by 90 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Sharan (by 105 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.9 meters
Gross weight: 2`505 kg2`370 kg
Net weight:1`656 kg1`728 kg
Load capacity:849 kg642 kg
Ford Galaxy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem more than Volkswagen Sharan. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
low

low
Volkswagen Sharan has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Sharan quality is probably better
Average price (€): 660010 600
Pros and Cons: Ford Galaxy has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv