Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Seat Alhambra 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy engine produces 13 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but higher. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 267 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Galaxy has 123 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. The Seat Alhambra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy scores higher in safety tests, but Seat Alhambra is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Galaxy scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |