Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Nissan Primastar 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 48 HP more power than Nissan Primastar, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Nissan Primastar. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.5 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Primastar, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.94 m | |
| Ford Galaxy is 4 cm longer than the Nissan Primastar, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 2150 litres | |
|
Nissan Primastar has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Galaxy has 1760 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Primastar. This could mean that the Ford Galaxy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Primastar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Nissan Primastar has
| |