Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but higher. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 390 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2325 litres | 2430 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Seat Alhambra has more luggage space (by 419 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Alhambra (by 105 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`505 kg | 2`540 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`656 kg | 1`851 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 849 kg | 689 kg | |
| Ford Galaxy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Seat Alhambra. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |