Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Seat Alhambra 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 10 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but higher. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 390 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2325 litres | 2297 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Ford Galaxy has more luggage space (by 123 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 28 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`505 kg | 2`540 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`656 kg | 1`768 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 849 kg | 772 kg | |
| Ford Galaxy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Seat Alhambra. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy scores higher in safety tests, but Seat Alhambra is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Galaxy scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |