Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Renault Trafic 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 25 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Trafic. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 5.18 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.94 m | |
Ford Galaxy is smaller. Ford Galaxy is 36 cm shorter than the Renault Trafic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 18 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 2150 litres | |
Renault Trafic has more luggage space. Ford Galaxy has 1760 litres less trunk space than the Renault Trafic. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 13.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 1.2 metres less than that of the Renault Trafic, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`790 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford Galaxy scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Galaxy scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9600 | 16 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |