Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy 2010 is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy 2010 engine produces 58 HP more power than Ford Galaxy 2006, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Ford Galaxy 2006. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy 2006 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Galaxy 2010 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy 2006, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Galaxy 2010 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy 2006. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Ford Galaxy 2010 and Ford Galaxy 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 308 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy 2010 has more luggage capacity. Ford Galaxy 2010 has 82 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy 2006. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |