Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 63 HP more power than Renault Grand Scenic, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Renault Grand Scenic. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.7 | |
| Ford Galaxy consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 26 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 208 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 208 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 390 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2063 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Ford Galaxy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`128 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |