Ford Galaxy 2011 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 25 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.7 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but higher. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 267 litres | |
Ford Galaxy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Galaxy has 123 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. The Seat Alhambra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`370 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
Quality: | low | low | |
Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 10 000 | 11 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |