Ford Galaxy 2011 vs Mazda 5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy and Mazda 5 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 23 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 13 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 390 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1485 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Ford Galaxy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mazda 5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 5, so Mazda 5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 5 has
| |