Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 10 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but higher. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 267 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Galaxy has 123 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. The Seat Alhambra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`460 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
| |