Ford Galaxy 2015 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2020
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 210 HP | 122 HP | |
Torque: | 450 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 88 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Volkswagen Caddy. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.5 | |
The Volkswagen Caddy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
1330 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
Ford Galaxy is larger, but lower. Ford Galaxy is 34 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 3100 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3100 litres | |
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Galaxy has 2800 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. This could mean that the Ford Galaxy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`620 | 2`220 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 13 800 | 22 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |