Ford Galaxy 2015 vs Seat Alhambra 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy engine produces 30 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Seat Alhambra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| 970 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 1 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 267 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Galaxy has 33 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. The Seat Alhambra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`595 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy scores higher in safety tests, but Seat Alhambra is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Galaxy scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |