Ford Galaxy 2015 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford C-Max, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| 970 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 46 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1684 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Galaxy has 132 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. This could mean that the Ford Galaxy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`595 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Galaxy scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |