Ford Galaxy 2015 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 40 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 1 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 809 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 300 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2339 litres | 2430 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Alhambra (by 91 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`600 kg | 2`540 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`685 kg | 1`851 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 915 kg | 689 kg | |
| Ford Galaxy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Seat Alhambra. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |