Ford Galaxy 2015 vs Seat Alhambra 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 240 HP | 220 HP | |
Torque: | 345 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 20 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, but torque is 5 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Despite the higher power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
620 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 1 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 267 litres | |
Ford Galaxy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Galaxy has 33 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. The Seat Alhambra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`585 | 2`490 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford Galaxy scores higher in safety tests, but Seat Alhambra is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Galaxy scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | low | low | |
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 14 000 | 16 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |