Ford Galaxy 2015 vs Seat Alhambra 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 20 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, but torque is 5 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Despite the higher power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 1 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 267 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 300 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2339 litres | 2297 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 42 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`585 kg | 2`490 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`658 kg | 1`763 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 927 kg | 727 kg | |
| Ford Galaxy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Seat Alhambra. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy scores higher in safety tests, but Seat Alhambra is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Galaxy scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |