Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 174 HP | 90 - 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 240 NM | 170 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 19.1 seconds | 11.8 - 19.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 13.8 | 6.5 - 13.6 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, a Ford Galaxy with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |