Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Audi A3 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 174 HP | 90 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 240 NM | 145 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 19.1 seconds | 7.5 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 13.8 | 4.9 - 8.9 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 47 cm longer than the Audi A3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 31 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1110 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.8 metres more than that of the Audi A3, which means Ford Galaxy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Audi A3 has
| |