Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Ford S-Max 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Ford Galaxy is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford S-Max can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 174 HP | 115 - 240 HP | |
Torque: | 170 - 240 NM | 185 - 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 19.1 seconds | 7.9 - 13 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 13.8 | 5.2 - 8.3 | |
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford S-Max. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but higher. Ford Galaxy is 15 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 285 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2000 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 2`457 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 6200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.2/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |