Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Ford Galaxy 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 1.9 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 90 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 170 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 6.2 - 11.9 | |
|
On average, the Ford Galaxy 2000 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Ford Galaxy 2003. On average, a Ford Galaxy 2000 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford Galaxy 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy 2000 and Ford Galaxy 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`933 | ~ 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |