Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Toyota Sienna 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Galaxy is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota Sienna is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 (petrol, diesel) | 3.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Ford Galaxy is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 197 - 213 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 284 - 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 9.4 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 9.5 - 9.6 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Sienna. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Galaxy is 28 cm shorter than the Toyota Sienna, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`933 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |