Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 90 - 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 178 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 7.7 - 9.5 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Picnic. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 11 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2610 litres | 1840 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage capacity. Ford Galaxy has 150 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 770 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`427 kg | ~ 2`007 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`659 kg | ~ 1`378 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 768 kg | ~ 629 kg | |
| Ford Galaxy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Toyota Picnic. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |